��ݮ����Ƶ����

Widespread species decline at the hands of humans is a powerful tale. According to the , more than 27 per cent of 100,000 assessed species are threatened with extinction. This disappearance is a warning that something is amiss on Earth.

�ճ���� is the  defined as widespread  caused by human activity. Some predict history will remember it as the  on Earth.

Yet when the choice lies between protecting an endangered species or pursuing economic development, we almost always side with development. Maybe this shouldn’t be a surprise: as a species, we have evolved with a  over environmentally rational decisions. The world is literally dying around us as we continue to pursue the myth of endless growth.

Paying no heed

In June 2019, Canada’s federal government  to carry oil from Alberta to the coast of British Columbia. It did so despite an  that found marine vessel traffic associated with the additional pipeline capacity will further dim the already dire prospects for the .

This was not much of a surprise, really, since the federal government had already approved the pipeline expansion in November 2016. That  by the Federal Court of Appeal in August 2018, in part because the original environmental assessment had failed to consider the pipeline’s adverse impacts to the marine environment.

A family of southern resident killer whales swims through the Haro Strait, between Vancouver Island in Canada, and San Juan Island in the United States.(Shutterstock)

At a policy level, Canada marked its commitment to protect species at risk in 1992 when it ratified the . The federal, provincial and territorial governments agreed to a .

The strongest legislation to protect species at risk in Canada is generally considered to be the federal  (SARA). But describing SARA as “strong” is misleading.

Studies show that species are  to be listed as threatened or endangered under SARA if they are the target of a commercial harvest. The most obvious example may be the demise of the , a marine fish once abundant off the coast of Newfoundland. It has still not been listed under SARA despite having lost 99 per cent of its population since the 1960s due to overfishing.

And only rarely does the habitat necessary to the survival or recovery of a species at risk, called , get legally protected under SARA.

As the Trans Mountain pipeline expansion approval illustrates, SARA is too easily disregarded by federal officials. Arguably SARA has protected only two species from economic development: the small population of  in southeastern Alberta and a population of the  in a suburb of Montréal.

Whooping crane woes

Some provinces still have no dedicated legislation for the protection of species at risk. . Provincial officials in Alberta routinely approve resource development at the expense of species at risk protection.

Perhaps the most glaring and obvious example is the massive ecological footprint of forestry, drilling sites, seismic lines, oilsands mines and in-situ oil extraction projects in northern Alberta. This has contributed to a .

Alberta continues to offer  to halt this decline. But in 2018, the province , claiming that Albertans needed a caribou protection plan that also protected jobs and the economy. Say what?

A recent assessment says 81 per cent of Canada’s woodland caribou herds are in decline, mainly due to altered habitat. (Shutterstock)

On July 25, the  yet another new oilsands mine to be constructed and operated by Teck Resources just 30 kilometres south of Wood Buffalo National Park, despite finding that the mine will have a significant adverse impact on what is left of caribou habitat in this region of Alberta.

The Alberta Energy Regulator also acknowledged that the proposed Teck mine falls under the migratory pathway for the only native population of migratory whooping cranes on Earth (their summer breeding habitat is protected in Wood Buffalo National Park), and that during migration, the cranes could land on the mine’s tailings ponds and come into contact with the toxic soup.

�ճ���� is listed as an endangered species under SARA, and mortality risk during migration is considered to be a primary threat to the overall total population of about .

Nonetheless, the Alberta Energy Regulator found that any additional mortality of cranes because of this new mine would not have any adverse impact on the species. It would rely on proposed bird deterrent mechanisms to prevent cranes from landing in the tailings ponds. Yet  and surely any adverse impact on an endangered species should be viewed as significant.

The Teck mine still requires  before it can proceed, so there is perhaps still a distant hope of protecting further destruction of habitat for the threatened caribou and endangered cranes.

Commercial pass

British Columbia is another province without dedicated endangered species protection laws. Enacting new legislation had been a  for the B.C. government until recently, when in response to concerns about the adverse economic impacts of protecting caribou, the premier announced that new legislation was .

�ճ���� was, at one time, considered to be strong legislation. However, in 2013 the Ontario government enacted  under the legislation to exempt certain commercial activities such as forestry, hydro-electric generation, quarrying and wind power generation from rules that protect endangered species.

Read more: 

In April 2019, the Ontario government  to its Endangered Species Act. Environmental advocates say these changes will  in the province.

Economic gain, environmental pain

Meaningful legal protection of species at risk in Canada requires effective legislation implemented by all levels of government, but the provinces are the key. That’s because the overwhelming majority of endangered wildlife in Canada and their habitat are located on lands owned by the provinces.

Read more: 

Habitat loss is the primary cause of species decline and energy development is a significant contributor in this regard. Those with the greatest legal power to protect species at risk (that is, provincial officials) also happen to be those with the most to gain economically from the extraction and development of natural resources.

The result is predictable. Species decline will continue to accelerate in Canada as we push for more energy development and reduce the regulation of �����Ի���. Legal protection for endangered species in Canada seems to be getting weaker at precisely the moment when it should be getting stronger.

, associate professor of law, .

This article is republished from under a Creative Commons license. Read the .