��ݮ����Ƶ����

Wetlands in Canada’s boreal forest contain deep deposits of carbon-rich soils, made up of decomposed vegetation (peat) that has accumulated over thousands of years. Globally, peatlands store as all of the world’s forests combined. Protecting this carbon store is in the fight against climate change.

But the amazing capacity of boreal peatlands to store carbon is being curbed by oil and gas exploration.

Our recent study in the journal Nature Communications shows how vast networks of seismic lines — long clearings constructed for petroleum exploration — . In Alberta alone, these undocumented emissions would boost Canada’s national reporting of methane in the category of land use, land-use change and forestry by about eight per cent.

And, regrettably, that’s probably an underestimate.

Petroleum and peatlands

Oil sands deposits in Alberta. Government of Alberta

Alberta has immense petroleum deposits, including the . The bulk of these deposits are found in the northern part of the province: a landscape that also contains .

When most people think of northern Alberta’s petroleum industry, they envision the large surface mines located near Fort McMurray. Yet most of the province’s oil and gas, including , is found in reservoirs that are too deep for surface mining.

Across much of Alberta, petroleum companies use deep wells to access oil and gas. The surface footprint of this “in-situ” extraction is less intensive than mining, but — as we explain below — the operations create a dense network of disturbances that cover a much larger area.

Seismic lines

In the hunt for subsurface petroleum deposits, oil and gas companies construct seismic lines. Seismic lines are linear features, two metres to 10 metres wide, cut through the forest using bulldozers or other types of machinery.

Once cut, seismic lines provide access for field crews to place to search underground for petroleum reservoirs. This form of exploration has been taking place in Alberta .

Seismic lines are linear clearings two to 10 metres wide that have been constructed for petroleum exploration. Sarah Cole, Author provided

have been cut in Alberta alone, enough to circle the planet 45 times. This little-known feature is by far the most common type of industrial disturbance in Alberta’s boreal forest.

A thousand cuts

The ecological impacts of seismic lines on boreal ecosystems are substantial. Though seismic lines are most closely associated with the , researchers have shown that they influence everything from to . In the Lower Athabasca region of Alberta, in-situ development has shifted the composition of , creating both winners (wolf, coyote and white‐tailed deer) and losers (caribou, black bear and fox).

Compared to wildlife, the effect of seismic lines on soil and carbon dynamics has received little public attention.

In general, boreal peatlands are — that is, they take up more carbon from the atmosphere than they release. However, industrial disturbances can shift the balance. Rather than accumulating organic matter, disturbed peatlands can that has been building up in the soil since the last ice age, more than 11,000 years ago.

Undocumented emissions

We used data from the to identify over 345,000 km of seismic lines crossing peatlands in Alberta. This translates to more than 1,900 sq. km of disturbance: an area almost three times the size of all the active oil-sands surface mines in Canada.

The equipment that cuts seismic lines through peatlands removes vegetation and compresses the soil, creating . This leads to increased emissions of methane: a potent greenhouse gas with .

We estimate that seismic lines increase methane emissions in Alberta by 4,400 to 5,100 metric tons annually. That’s equivalent to the CO2 emitted by about driven for one year.

This amount is relatively small compared to the 251,000 tonnes of methane generated naturally by Alberta peatlands each year. However, these induced emissions are not part of Canada’s national carbon accounting, mandated under the Paris Agreement. If included, these emissions would increase the amount of methane reported for for all of Canada by seven to eight per cent.

Illustrated by Jennifer Hird @JNHird and Lucy Poley @lucygempoley.

A conservative estimate

We’re being conservative in our estimates here, since we account only for the effect of seismic lines making peatlands wetter. Soils on seismic lines also , which may further increase methane emissions.

In addition, we suspect that the true length of seismic lines in Alberta is much greater than the 1.8 million km documented in public records.

To investigate this latter point, we looked at a 10,000 sq. km portion of boreal forest near Conklin, Alta. We found that more than 70 per cent of the narrow seismic lines cut since the mid-1990s were missing from the public dataset. This is because these narrow lines are difficult to detect in the satellite imagery used to record disturbances.

Our estimates also exclude emissions from seismic lines crossing peatlands in other parts of Canada.

Seismic lines in northern Alberta often occur in tight grids spaced less than 100 metres apart, and are difficult to map using coarse-resolution satellite imagery. This high-resolution scene shows a dense network of narrow seismic lines (in the photo, faint hashmarks), alongside more prominent square exploration pads. Google Earth

Restoration targets

There is currently no legislation for restoring seismic lines in Alberta, despite suggesting that seismic lines .

Leading petroleum companies in Alberta are pioneering for erasing seismic lines from the landscape, including site preparation and tree planting. Their efforts are motivated primarily by the mandated by the federal Species at Risk Act. Whether these treatments also restore peatlands’ natural carbon dynamics is largely unknown.

Our work comes out weeks after researchers revealed over the oil-sands surface mines. Undocumented greenhouse gas emissions and the ones we report are silently contributing to climate change. Through better measurement of all emissions, we can develop strategies that result in real climate action.

, Professor, Department of Geography, and , Associate professor, Department of Geography and Environmental Management,

This article is republished from under a Creative Commons license. Read the .