David Wright
Nov. 27, 2023
Policy labs give students experience in what it takes to effect legal, policy change
Environmental impact assessment (EIA) has become a cornerstone of environmental law worldwide. In Canada, this area of law has become controversial and politically charged, with the undergoing a significant overhaul in 2019, leading to a constitutional challenge at the Supreme Court of Canada in early 2023.
For Canadian law students, it鈥檚 the perfect time to study environmental impact assessment law, and 鈥減olicy labs鈥 allow 草莓污视频导航 students to practise what it takes to change law and policy in different jurisdictions across the country.
鈥淭his course at this time is basically a dream come true,鈥 says Professor David Wright. 鈥淭here is so much change in this area of law and policy at the moment, that it made total sense for the students to engage in real-world processes in real time. These students are going to know more about this field than most senior practitioners, and they鈥檒l have the policy lab experiences to back it up.鈥
1st lab focuses on recommendations for Nova Scotia
Students in Law 623: Environmental Impact Assessment Law participated in two policy labs this term, one focused on a provincial assessment regime, and the other focused on federal. In the first lab, students rolled up their sleeves and generated recommendations to The public consultation period was open during the fall term, meaning student recommendations have the potential to influence reform of that EIA process.
David Wright
鈥淭he Nova Scotia policy lab forced all of us to mobilize our thinking and understanding of the course material in a way that could directly impact government action,鈥 explains third-year student AJ Macaulay. 鈥
Knowing our submissions would be received by the Nova Scotia government and that our groups had the potential to influence regulatory decision-making led to very collaborative and meaningful discussions while testing our understanding of the course material in a way that can鈥檛 be accomplished solely through the traditional lecture and exam process.鈥
According to second-year student Nicole Achtymichuk, the class provided recommendations on aspects that the Nova Scotia government should consider when modernizing its impact assessment process, including requiring meaningful public participation and improving associated processes, and explicitly requiring consideration of climate change and the impacts of a project鈥檚 greenhouse gas emissions.
听The group鈥檚 recommendations were compiled into a , the Faculty of Law鈥檚 blog.
2nd lab explores recent Supreme Court decision
The second policy lab used the majority decision of the Supreme Court of Canada鈥檚 on the constitutionality of the federal Impact Assessment Act to make draft recommendations to align the contentious sections of the Act with the court鈥檚 guidance.听
For Achtymichuk, the policy labs have been an excellent opportunity to put high-level ideas and theories about what impact assessment should be into action.
鈥淚t鈥檚 one thing to read and interpret a Supreme Court decision, but it鈥檚 another to put the court鈥檚 guidance into action to draft legislative changes,鈥 she says.
鈥淭he last lab has helped us make sense of the Supreme Court opinion, and we鈥檝e developed predictions on what impact assessment law may look like in the future. Many of us in the class want to work in the environmental and energy law fields, so having the opportunity to work with the court's decision will be invaluable once we enter practice.鈥
Macaulay agrees, adding that the policy labs force students to step outside their comfort zone.听
鈥淭hese exercises test our understanding of the material with a degree of realism and importance that merges our understanding of the course material in a setting that also requires collaboration, co-operation, and teamwork.鈥